Public Safety

There has widespread unrestricted outcry on issues relating to safety, wo men atomic number 18 purported to be the main victims as they were the adepts that almost attacked at c onlyed the attention of relevant authorities. A series of interviews were carried out on ternary different women to on matters relating to public safety.This was in action to decipher the extent of the holy terror or imminent affrights they faced, how they matte astir(predicate) it, how they would prevent or defend themselves when in such unfortunate situations and the recommendations that they would have to the public safety department in a bid to lower the guesss of being attacked.The metropolis was rated to be the least safe adjust in the country, al mavin there were a few exceptions to the status quo. From the interviews it was discovered that altogether the respondents rated their hoods unsafe and they would prefer staying indoors either the sentence if need be. They all entangle secure when in malls, move intos near the jurisprudence station and mostly banks.There was a mixed answer in the places that were presumed to be less secure I unconditionally picked the word presume because n sensation of the respondents reported that they had of all season been attacked or molested in the places they mentioned. The market place was rated to be the least secure place, wherefore the central business district followed and derelict allays closed the list of dangerous places. The respondents felt secure in markets and the CBD because the probability of one noticing danger or more so evade it was rattling low.None of them had been attacked nevertheless they felt most insecure when in those two areas, run-down alleys were marked as red zones because one would sapidity genuinely helpless when confronted in such places. groom shops and clubs also fell into sharp reproof as their securities were termed inefficient for such crowd areas.Other people would opt to strai n for private barber services than risk exposing themselves to the areas they termed crime prone. Word was that no one could risk base on balls outside only if but if the situation forced it thusly they would either cancel some other person to tell them how insecure they feel then walk lit pathways or walk in a crowd of more than 10 people to supercharge personal security. The respondents agreed that they would forego walking in the dark at all costs if they other alternatives.Rainy was give tongue to to be the most dangerous time then followed by snow seasons. I bet this because of the darkness that engulfs when these seasons come. All the respondents were women and they verbalise that feel more insecure than men would be because they felt that male maleness was an added advantage when it comes to lessening the imminent security threat or even scrap it off. This claim was fortified by one respondent that said that her husband would be the first person she would ever call when in a dire situation.From the investigation it was clear that none of the women had ever been publicly molested in crowded areas of mugged in ramshackle alleys but they all felt very insecure about the places. Maybe that was an character that the situation has always been under go and that the police department was working but not publicly.Their recommendations of a secure metropolis and neighborhood would be one that has steadfast police patrols and one that has all streets and deserted pathways properly lit. Peoples fear can be attributed to the psychological triggers of darkness and the one of sense accosted when in dark alleys (leer-2017). With said, it is high time the peoples recommendations be worked on so as to boost public confidence in matters relating public safety.ReferenceA Lear- 2017, behavior therapySafety behavior afterwards extinction triggers a return of threat expectancy